The effective-access failures of the Admin role in the Windows Server
2022 cell don't depend on the module. A replay of seven cells with the
baseline and the final candidate alternating failed the baseline in two
of three cells and the final candidate in one of three, not counting the
warm-up. In a failing cell the remote authorization managers answer as
if the account had no groups while the name resolution, the Kerberos
logon, and the local manager are right in the same second.
One model with one lifetime (9.35 to 10.20 minutes) fits all 43 Admin
role runs of 27 cells, and none of 5,000 random assignments of the
outcomes does. Four more cells with unique account names pass, two of
them where the model predicts a failure for a reused name.
The record, the README, and a timeline CSV now say what the evidence
supports and what it doesn't establish, that the cleanup check ran with
real residue, and that fdd7a8b reverts cleanly while 962887a conflicts
with it.
Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: AI Assistant <ai@example.com>
The record, its tables (the suite per candidate, the failing tests, and the
controller cells), and the README of the lab. The final local candidate passes the
module's suite on Windows Server 2019, 2022, and 2025, Windows 11 22H2 and 26H1,
and the host in both editions, elevated and as a basic user, and the live
controller in three cells. The record states what a local build does not prove.
Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: AI Assistant <ai@example.com>
Raimund Andree